Future of Olympic Games

Introduction to Blog

The Olympic Games is the greatest multi sport event on earth, regularly drawing in overall groups the billions to watch consideration of contenders from numerous nations. It has gotten a great deal of canny thought, especially with respect to media incorporation, usage, and co-creation. As consideration can influence media clients' impression of nations, social orders, and issues, it is basic to encourage a perception of assessment designs interfacing with the Olympic Games and media to uncover openings in the composing which may be filled by future scholastic work. Along these lines, to highlight designs in the spread out composition and uncover locales for development, a productive composing study was coordinated to take a gander at the region of Olympic media research more than a 20-year stretch of time (1999-2018). An amount of 221 articles were investigated, uncovering encounters into the sorts of investigation being made from speculative, key, and important perspectives. Results revealed a basic degree of award focused in on the Summer Olympic Games, the United States, news records of the Games, and utilized media illustrating and plan setting structures and the substance assessment reasoning. Basically over part of the assessments utilized a speculative or determined framework, the normality of which extended after some time. Focus areas for continued with headway in the Olympic media space embraced and laying out research for speculation, extension in research setting, and fostering the significance of the Olympic Games inside the more essential Olympic Movement.

Image by Photo Mix from Pixabay

Past of Olympic Games 

Since its starting in 1896, the state of the art Olympic Games have formed to transform into the greatest multi sport event on earth. The last two arrivals of the Games, held in PyeongChang, South Korea in 2018, and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in 2016, featured 2,833 contenders from 92 nations and 11,238 contenders from 207 nations, independently (PyeongChang 2018, 2020; Rio 2016, 2020). While a small piece of the general people can go to the Games up close and personal, media consideration of the Games contacts overall hordes of something like 4.5 billion [International Olympic Committee (IOC), 2019]. It is unquestionable in the Olympic media composing that consideration of the Games can influence entire nations and social orders, and consequently the examination of such media is huge. For example, Eagleman et al. (2014) communicated that media consideration expects a tremendous part in making the reality of the Olympic Games for the people who can't participate and encounter it firsthand, and the way news sources present the Olympic Games can have "massive consequences for occupants' viewpoints on subjects like direction, character, and the clear meaning of specific games over others" (p. 457).

Present Situation

The all over distinction and extended usage of electronic amusement since the 2004 Summer Olympic Games suggests that the present overall groups are consuming media incorporation about the Games, but are really adding to it and attracting with it as well (Liu, 2016), thusly participating in fact co-creation of the Games close by standard media sources. During the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics, over 1.6 billion Olympic-related accounts were seen through online diversion stages like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, SnapChat, and YouTube (Publicis Media, 2018). No matter what the prevalence of online diversion use to consume the Olympic Games (close by regular use systems like TV or paper), two complete composing overviews of virtual amusement and game both uncovered only a solitary report interfacing with the Olympic Games up to the year 2015 (Abeza et al., 2015; Filo et al., 2015).

Image by dan onaca from Pixabay

Recent Research About Olympic Games

The examination of media as incorporation, use, and co-creation during the Olympic Games is a notable exploration stream inside the game organization composing, yet no gigantic degree study of this composing exists. Given the meaning of Olympic media consideration in presenting the reality of the event for the billions of game buyers who can't go to the Games there of brain, with the later enhancements of virtual diversion usage and use interfacing with the Olympic Games, a study of composing associated with Olympic media is fundamental to uncover what is being found out about this point. For example, what sorts of media have been by and large comprehensively thought of? From what public settings? Using which systems and theories? Answering inquiries, for instance, these through an organized overview of relevant composing is basic to help Olympic media specialists with understanding where openings exist in this line of solicitation to all the more promptly pack research in youthful districts and to copy past assessments where central. Schulenkorf et al. (2016) communicated that, "study articles are huge as they check out and summarize past investigation by arriving at broad surmisings from many separate examinations that address an equivalent subject" (p. 23). Subsequently, the justification behind this overview was to examine the region of Olympic media research utilizing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Doing so will ensure that countless focuses and settings interfacing with Olympic media are focused on in the future to ensure that a fair, especially illuminating assortment of composing exists for scientists, students, and subject matter experts.

Materials and Methods

This paper followed a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, and that means to "assemble, sum up and evaluate verification about a particular locale" (Ahmed et al., 2019, p. 75). Ahmed et al. (2019) similarly saw that SLR can reveal openings in the composition on a specific point, taking into account further information regarding the matter being referred to, as well as uncovering any recommendations for future assessment. According to Snyder (2019), composing overviews "can initiate novel contemplations and headings for a particular field" (p. 339). SLR has been utilized in research from a couple of unmistakable disciplines to focus on subjects, for instance, electronic diversion use for data sharing (e.g., Ahmed et al., 2019), PC programming (e.g., Kitchenham et al., 2009), and screen time and rest for youths (e.g., Hale and Guan, 2015). SLR is seen as by a significant number individuals to be the greatest level for composing overviews, and the amount of business-related composing studies using the SLR procedure is creating (Snyder, 2019).

Image by Dias12 from Pixabay

What is meant by SLR?

Kitchenham (2004) presented a seven-step process for coordinating a SLR, including the going with: (1) recognizing the necessity for a study; (2) encouraging a review show; (3) perceiving the investigation; (4) picking the fundamental assessments; (5) playing out a quality assessment; (6) eliminating and really taking a look at the data; and (7) organizing the data. Snyder (2019) for the most part rehashed this urging through four maneuvers toward arrangement, lead, analyze, and make the review. For the continuous survey, the necessity for a study of composing interfacing with Olympic media was spread out in the show fragment; regardless, a review of six additional steps from Kitchenham's cycle occurs here.

 The ensuing stage, cultivating a review show, decreases the chance for research inclination by making unequivocal procedures for picking the composition to be investigated in the SLR (Kitchenham, 2004). It allows the experts to set express guidelines for focus on decision as well as to conclude how data will be accumulated and composed. One phase in the review show process is to spread out thought and disallowance guidelines for the assessment studies to be broke down. Thought and dismissal guidelines ensure "that all picked fundamental assessments in the SLR are applicable, and are associated with the audit" (Ahmed et al., 2019, p. 75). The thought models used for this study included examinations:

 Coding Procedures

 A coding show including implications of each and every variable was made to coordinate the coding framework, and a data extraction structure was made to allow the researchers to record immensely significant information from the articles. The going with factors were taken on from practically identical examinations by Abeza et al. (2015), Filo et al. (2015), and Schulenkorf et al. (2016) and were coded in a Microsoft Excel computation sheet for each article: focus on ID (given out number for each survey), focus on title, essayist name(s), journal name, circulation year, speculative/sensible construction, Olympic setting (e.g., 2016 Rio Summer Olympic Games), geographic setting, media format(s) broke down/focused in on in the audit, system, reason clarification, and DOI. A couple of assessments focused in on a specific game or contender, and in those cases the game name or contender name was moreover kept in the "Olympic setting" variable.

Image by StockSnap from Pixabay

Overall Result

The lead expert filled in as the fundamental examiner (data coder) in this audit. Rodent (2019) exhibited that while two pundits may be used in SLR studies, one expert is OK. To complete the data extraction structure, the lead researcher read the hypothetical, show, speculative/sensible framework region (in case one existed), and the method part of every single article in the dataset. Right when questions arose about a specific code (e.g., speculative/determined framework), the researcher read additional pieces of the article attempting to find the reaction. For example, there were a couple of articles where it was undefined whether a speculative or sensible framework was used. One typical model happened when the name of a design was used in the title of the article (e.g., "Illustrating of … "), yet framing speculation, an explanation of the maxim "framing," or possibly a reference to the essential work on this theory were never referred to inside the article body.

I hope you have enjoyed this article!!!